Skip to content


The View from Israel: the Cyprus-Israel Connection

by Amy Styer

23 April 2013. Jerusalem, Israel. What does the banking crisis in Cyprus have to do with king crisis in Cyprusan Israeli oil field and a Texan drilling company? The banking crisis in Cyprus might have been the big news this past week, but there is a quieter event that could have much greater consequences for the region. The Tamar gas field discovered off the coast of Israel in 2009 began delivering natural gas on March 30th. The connection between Israel and Cyprus is via Noble Energy, Inc.

Noble Energy took a risk when it agreed to drill in Israeli territory in the Mediterranean.  The company knew that signing up with Israel would mean being blacklisted by oil rich Arab nations, lucrative potential customers. Israel wanted Noble, and only Noble, to do the drilling because it has a reputation as the best deep drilling company in the world able to reach more than five miles into the bottom of the ocean. The risk paid off when 90 km off the northern coast of Israel the Tamar field was discovered holding 238 billion cubic meters (bcm) of natural gas.

Oil-poor Israel celebrated the news of Tamar, but then an even larger discovery was made. Just 45 km from the Tamar site, the Leviathan field dwarfs Tamar. Initial testing indicated there could be 453 bcm of gas. Production of the area could begin in 2016.

The Mediterranean between Israel and Cyprus.

This is where Cyprus connection comes in. The Leviathan field crosses from Israel’s territorial waters into Cyprus’. Cyprus and Israel have already worked out the touchy situation of demarcating territorial waters (normally a nation has exclusive drilling rights up to 200 miles off its coast, but because the two countries are so close their territories overlap). The Cypriot part of the Leviathan field, called Aphrodite, looks to be larger than all of Israel’s fields combined.

Noble is also going to start drilling in Crete’s territorial waters in the near future. There is a plan to connect the fields of Israel, Cyprus, and Crete with a pipeline approximately 750 miles long. Cyprus and Crete cannot afford to build the pipeline, a necessity for distribution. A consortium of Israeli and American oil companies could possibly raise the capital and complete the job. The three countries would be able to supply Europe with all its natural gas needs for the next twenty years.

Cyprus, amid a banking disaster, and Crete, caught up in the Greek debt crisis, could benefit greatly from the gas discoveries. On a recent visit to Cyprus, I met many elders and not many younger people. In the pastoral village of Lefkara, the elementary school was nearly empty. I spoke to a woman sitting outside embroidering a pillow. She said that because there are no jobs, all their children left. When I asked her about the possibility of Cyprus becoming one of the wealthiest nations in the Mediterranean, she flipped her hand in a get out of here sort of gesture. “It could happen,” I insisted.

Apart from the much needed economic boom, the pipeline means that Europe will have an alternative to the Russian monopoly which currently supplies 50 percent of its natural gas. Not only does Russia control the price of natural gas in Europe, in the winter of 2008, gas was cut to Central European nations because of a conflict between Russia and the Ukraine over pricing. For over two weeks people froze in their homes and economies were shaken.

The oil discovery also means that Israel will no longer be dependent on Egypt for natural gas. After the overthrow of former President Hosni Mubarak, the pipeline between Egypt and Israel was blown up 18 times. The new government of Egypt wanted to charge higher prices and discussed halting service all together. The uncertainty caused natural gas prices to spike in Israel. People worried that there would be shortages. Hasty negotiations were brokered by the US between Israel and Egypt. Suddenly, all that is irrelevant.

There was some talk of exploring for natural gas off the coast of Gaza. Israel even invited British officials to help the Palestinians. The project had to be called off when Israel realized that the only way for Palestinians to sell the gas was by converting it to liquefied natural gas (LNG). An explosion of LNG could be stronger than the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima, a risk Israel wasn’t willing to take with Hamas-controlled Gaza.

What does the natural gas discovery mean for the average person in Israel? The same month that pumping began at the Tamar field, we were surprised to learn that electricity costs would be going up by 6.5 percent. The minister of Energy and Water Resources, Silvan Shalom, said this was because it would take time for the natural gas to reach the electric companies who would then pass on the savings to the customers. It was a reality check for people fantasizing the Tamar field would turn Israel into an oil-fat Gulf State. Yes, it’s nice to finally have a natural resource, but we shouldn’t give up on the hard working ethos that got the state this far.

Amy Styer is a freelance journalist based in Jerusalem, Israel.

Posted on: April 24, 2013, 3:35 pm Category: The View From Here Tagged with: , , , , ,

Religion Today Lesson Plans

Students will learn about The Vatican by viewing a National Geographic documentary, explore the issue of Islamophobia and determine religion’s role in current event issues.

View the video Religion in America by CBS News

Discussion Guide

 

Lesson Plan 1- The Vatican

Objective:  Students will learn about The Vatican by viewing a National Geographic documentary

 

Lesson Plan 2- Islamophobia

Objective:  Students will conduct research and write an essay on Islamophobia

 

Lesson Plan 3- Religion Today

Objective:  Students will conduct research to determine the role religion plays in current events issues

 

21st Century Core Content
History

21st Century Themes
Global Awareness

21st Century Skills
Think Creatively
Work Creatively With Others
Reason Effectively
Make Judgments and Decisions
Communicate Clearly
Collaborate with Others
Access and Evaluate Information
Work Independently
Be Self-directed Learners
Interact Effectively with Others
Work Effectively in Diverse Teams
Produce Results
Guide and Lead Others
Be Responsible to Others

 
Additional Resources:
Catholic League
Religion by NPR
Religions by BBC
Library of World Religions and Faith Traditions by Patheos
The Vatican

Additional Resources from Global Issues in Context:
Religion in Public Office
Religious Freedom
Religious Fundamentalism
Faith and Medicine
Islamophobia

Posted on: April 22, 2013, 12:28 pm Category: Lesson Plans and School Projects Tagged with: , , ,

The View from Down Under: Australia and a future with terrorism

by Joanne Lane

17 April 2013. Brisbane, Australia.

“This is an iconic race. This is a marathon’s Mecca, runners from all over the world make a pilgrimage to this run because it is the oldest running marathon in the world. There are 27,000 people from every corner of the world. Every religion, every colour, every creed are here.”

Australian marathon great Robert De Castella was in Boston this month to see one of his indigenous runners compete on the world stage. And perhaps unwittingly his response above gave some sort of clue as to why the marathon was targeted by bombs that killed three people and injured dozens others.

The marathon is one of the world’s oldest sporting challenges; a test of endurance, determination and tenacity. It is an event in which every participant is a hero. They’ve put in months of preparation, toiled for miles and the elation they experience at finishing after 42 kilometres is well deserved. As a keen runner, I know that feeling very well.

To have an event that should be a celebration of the human spirit targeted in such a way by terror is indeed as cowardly as newspapers and politicians have described across the world.

153 Australians were registered in the Boston marathon and while all are safe and accounted for, their tales are horrific. De Castella, the 1986 winner of theBostonmarathon, described the chaos and pandemonium after the blasts, particularly in finding his indigenous runner Emma Cameron who was evacuated from the course just one kilometre from the finishing line.

Sadly, in Australia we are somewhat used to running tragedies. In 2011 some runners suffered horrific burns when wildfires swept through the remote Kimberley region in Western Australia where they were competing in a 100km endurance race. And just weeks ago on March 24 my father was in the half marathon at the Twilight Running Festival in Brisbane when a storm erupted. High winds and rain lashed at runners making it almost impossible to continue. The event was cancelled but sadly one runner was killed by a falling tree branch.

Even though both events were a result of adverse weather, and not terrorism, there was a similar disbelief, like in Boston, that a sporting event could become the scene of such awful tragedy.

While remembering the Boston victims, attention has now turned in Australia to upcoming similar events that could pose security risks – the Gold Coast marathon in July that is a qualifying event for Boston and has 30,000 participants, the G20 world leaders’ summit in Brisbane next year that will be attended by dignitaries such as Barack Obama and Vladimir Putin, and the 2018 Commonwealth Games on the Gold Coast that will attract large numbers of athletes and spectators.

Sporting and international events aren’t the only concern, ANZAC Day parades and services to honour Australian servicemen and women are fast approaching on April 25 and are well attended across the country.

With these events in mind, political leaders across the country are already doing their bit to allay fears. Prime Minister Julia Gillard said the government would not be changing the terrorism alert level in Australia, while Queensland Premier Campbell Newman acknowledged the Boston bombings had brought to light security concerns for the G20 and they were planning for every possibility.

Foreign Minister Bob Carr told the 7.30 Report how counter intelligence had already unearthed evidence that had prevented terrorism downunder.

“’Given the anxiety we all felt in the immediate wake of September 11 it is somewhat reassuring that this is the worst international terrorism can do if indeed this turns out to be such an attack,” he said.

“If you look at the experience of terrorism since September 11 . . . what is striking is how little progress in over a decade that terrorists have made.”

Little progress or not, most Australians would probably be more concerned that events in Boston could happen at all. Talking to friends and family in the days since, the most common sentiment is an increasing fear that this could happen anywhere, to anyone, at anytime.

It’s a sentiment that is obviously real in the USA. LZ Granderson wrote for CNN with the same notion: “If September 11, 2001, was the day everything changed, then April 15, 2013, serves as another reminder of that change, of our frailties and of a new reality in which “it can’t happen here” has been replaced by “it can happen anywhere.””

But while our geographic distance to most world affairs has afforded Australia a protective cocoon to some degree, a number of incidents and shifts have broken this veneer. While the primary terrorism threat to Australia is from global jihadists — the Bali bombings in the early 2000s counted amongst these – a secondary threat comes from people born or raised in Australia who have been influenced by their message. Of concern presently are young Australian Lebanese fighting, and even dying, in the war in Syria who government leaders fear could become radicalized.

The government pulls no punches about these concerns. The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) publication “Transnational Terrorism” states plainly; “Australia is a terrorist target, both as a Western nation and in its own right. Intelligence confirms we were a target before the 11 September 2001 attacks, and we are still a target. Our interests both at home and abroad are in the terrorists’ sights.”

Small comfort perhaps, although it is encouraging to see the government face this threat head on. It was encouraging also to see the community of Boston, and its visitors, rally to help the injured, to give blood and to support one another. Despite the fear, the pandemonium, and chaos, those sentiments prevailed; effectively destroying some of the main tools of terrorism.

It was to these sentiments that Robert De Castella urged.

“This (Boston Marathon) is an event that brings the world together. So this is the last thing we should stop doing. We need more of these sorts of things not less…

“I’m of the view that the last thing we should do is kowtow to this sort of cowardice type action. We should continue to do what we always have done.”

In Australia that means continuing our tradition of public parades, barbecues, sporting and other events, and celebrating our religious tolerance and equality of opportunity for all races and gender.

The liberal democratic culture we live in has given us freedoms that we enjoy without impediment. It’s why boat loads of refugees seek our shores. It’s why immigrants come to be educated in our universities and people seek jobs in our economy.

The threat of terrorism, from within and without, is perhaps becoming an omnipresent force around the world, and while it might threaten us, we can respond in a way that doesn’t compromise our basic values or who we are as a society.

U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt spoke of the nameless fear of his age, the Great Depression of the 1930s, in similar terms. While his inspirational message will obviously resound most deeply with Americans, it is one for all ages and societies about how we look into a future with terrorism.

“So, first of all, let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself — nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance.”

Joanne Lane is a freelance photojournalist based in Brisbane, Australia.

Posted on: April 18, 2013, 12:28 pm Category: The View From Here Tagged with: , ,

The View from Great Britain: Margaret Thatcher’s Legacy

by Gabrielle Pickard

14 April 2013. Cheshire, United Kingdom. ‘The Lady Who Saved Great Britain Passes Away,’ boasts one British newspaper headline, a sentiment that couldn’t contrast more vividly to the chants of ‘Ding, Dong the Witch is Dead,’ that can be heard emerging from a council estate in a working-class area of East London.

Whether you loved her or loathed her, we cannot deny that Margaret Thatcher’s death on April 8, 2013 created a tidal wave of conflicting emotions to ripple across the British Isles. Whilst some people were sad, others couldn’t come close to shedding a tear for this steel-willed woman who they blamed for smashing the heart out of British industry and breaking the hearts and the will of the working class.

Whatever your feelings are towards the late ‘Iron Lady,’ Margaret Thatcher was certainly a woman who stuck unwaveringly to her principles and was tougher and more dynamic than most of her male predecessors, attributes that undoubtedly led to the former British Prime Minister creating an almost unrivalled legacy in the history of British politics.

In 1979, Margaret Thatcher became the UK’s first woman Prime Minister. Times were hard in Britain during this era, strikes were crippling the country, garbage piled up in the streets and the dead lay unburied. Thatcher began her time in office fighting from the off. In fact fighting was Mrs Thatcher’s trademark, and as time would tell, she did not often lose a fight. Her first important task as Prime Minister was to bring inflation down and tackle the trade unions; she would deal with those pesky European weaklings later!

Thatcher encouraged a shift from state controlled institutions to privatisation and economic reform. The service sector and home ownership boomed but manufacturing declined massively and unemployment rose. Consequently the country became divided.

Council houses

Margaret Thatcher believed quite strongly that people had a right to own their own home and in 1980 gave council house tenants the right to buy their houses at a massively discounted price. One million Britons took her up on the deal. Even today a form of the Housing Act 1980 is still running but is not popular with everyone. Former London Mayor, Ken Livingstone said about Thatcher’s 1980 housing scheme:

“She created today’s housing crisis. Of course she became popular with the people that she allowed to buy council houses but she didn’t build any new houses.”

61-year-old Paul Brenthurst, a retired electrician from the south of England, is one individual that is in ‘camp mourning’ over Margaret Thatcher’s death.

“Thatcher enabled me to buy my council house, which tripled in value in the pursuing decades, meaning I will be able to retire quite comfortably. She transformed Britain for the better, which is more than I can say about any of her feeble successors,” Mr Brenthouse declared.

The Falklands war with Argentina

With three million people claiming state benefit money in 1982 when Thatcher was well into her first term as Prime Minister, it was looking decidedly unlikely that she would win the looming general election. However, an event 8,000 miles away from British shores took place, which would essentially cement her power, raise her popularity and virtually ensure her at least another four years in Downing Street.

The Argentine Junta had invaded the disputed British territories of South Georgia and the Falklands. In 1980 Thatcher had already proved her ‘metal’ during a hostage crisis at the Iranian Embassy in London, when she called upon the SAS to put an end to the siege. Lives were lost but it was considered by most to have been a very successful operation. Meanwhile the far away islands in the South Atlantic needed to be recovered and that meant war with Argentina.

The Royal Navy, the Royal Air Force and soldiers from various units were mustered together as a task force, with the sole aim of retaking the Falklands and South Georgia and hoisting up the Union Jack. It was far from certain that the British servicemen would prevail, but Margaret Thatcher would not be denied her finest triumph.

Ships were sunk, aircraft were downed and soldiers were killed on both sides, but the Islands were retaken and as a consequence, Britain started to believe in itself again. It was undoubtedly Margaret Thatcher’s finest hour. The union flags flew all over the United Kingdom and for a while the divided nation was as one. The euphoria, however, quickly wore away.

The coalminers dispute

In 1984 there were some 187,000 coal miners in Great Britain. Thatcher’s government wanted to shut down some economically unviable pits, which would have put 20,000 miners instantly out of work. The country’s miners went on a strike, which lasted for the best part of a year. Whole communities where energetic old colliery towns once stood were industrially destroyed and rendered lifeless by the so-called ‘ruthless’ conservatives. To this day many of the miner’s children, now grown up, have only ever known a life on benefits. As miner’s daughter Sharon Brookes from a coal mining town in Durham said:

“The so-called Iron Lady destroyed my family’s livelihood in the mid-80s and I’ll never forgive her. We went from being comfortable and happy to skint and ill-fated almost instantly and have never managed to recover. Am I saddened by her death? Not an ounce of me feels any remorse.”

Europe
“The eyes of Caligula and the mouth of Marilyn Monroe,” said the former French president, Francois Mitterrand after one of his many ‘run-ins’ with Thatcher. As usual Thatcher’s unswerving stubbornness had prevailed in Europe and she achieved a massive rebate for Great Britain from the European Economic Community. The German Chancellor Helmet Kohl believes to this day that Britain’s ongoing awkwardness with Brussels is down to Margaret Thatcher.

David Cameron said of the ‘Great Prime Minister,’

“Many of the principles that Margaret Thatcher fought for are now part of the political landscape of our country.”

Whilst David Hopper, President of Durham’s Miners Association said:

“There is no sympathy from me for what she did to our community. She destroyed our community, our villages and our people.”

Mr Hopper who turned 70 this month, went on to say “It is the best birthday present that I have ever had.”

Love her or loath her, it cannot be denied, in the wake of her death, Margaret Thatcher’s legacy is more pertinent and contested than ever.

Gabrielle Pickard is a freelance writer based in Cheshire, United Kingdom.

Posted on: April 16, 2013, 10:28 am Category: The View From Here Tagged with: ,

The View from Great Britain: Cyprus “Bank Robbery”

by Gabrielle Pickard

09 April 2013. Cheshire, United Kingdom. The principal pillar of modern banking that ‘your money is safe with us,’ was blown apart in Cyprus recently as depositors were informed that they were about to have a fairly large slice of their hard earned money “taken.” Part of the conditions laid out in Cyprus’s ten billion Euro bailout are that savers with over 100,000 Euros in the bank must contribute 9.9% and savers with less than 100,000 Euros must pay 6.75 % towards the bailout repayments.

The announcement naturally sparked outrage, with the shock, anger and anxiety about the situation stretching beyond Cyprus and rippling across Europe.

Some 60,000 British expatriates live on Cyprus and it is believed that they have a total of around £1.7 billion deposited in Cypriot banks. If the current levy is imposed at the suggested percentages, these ex-pats will be instantly contributing around £115 million towards the Cypriot bailout. The 3,000 British servicemen on the island will be fully compensated by the British government, which means that the British taxpayer will ultimately foot that particular bill.

What really gnaws at the craws of the depositors in Cypriot banks is the belief that they were essentially lied to, being told by the banks that their money will be safe. As former BBC Middle East correspondent Chris Drake, who retired in Cyprus, told the Daily Mail:

“The money in my account is all I have to live on for the rest of my life. People were told that their money would be safe. I’ve lost several thousand euros.”

The Russians have a great deal more invested in Cypriot banks than any other nation. Amid suggestions of tax evasion and gangster-style money laundering, the Russian money was welcomed into the Cypriot banks with not too many questions being asked.

According to the banking risk management site, Moodys, the Russians have 21 billion Euros invested in Cypriot banks.  Whilst some of the money may well belong to Mafiosi and tax dodgers, it is fair to say that much of the deposits are legitimate business funds. Naturally the Kremlin is a little peeved at contributing towards the salvation of Cyprus’s problems when it feels that it has been hugely beneficial to the island’s economy over the years.

As President Vladimir Putin said in a press statement:

“The levy is unjust, unprofessional and dangerous.”

For perhaps the first time ever, Putin’s sentiments are shared throughout Europe.

It has to be said that banking consumer confidence in Europe is not particularly great at the moment and the Cypriot scandal has rocked a gravely fragile industry even further. In the UK, for example, the view that if they can do it in Cyprus, why can’t they do it here, is not just confined to the thoughts of a couple of paranoid sceptics.

54-year-old Gemma Woods has a property in Spain and regularly sends money out there in order to pay for the mortgage and bills on the property.

“Who says they won’t do a similar thing in Spain or even Britain,” Gemma told me.

“I’ve got a good mind to withdraw all the money I have in the allegedly safe banks and do what the Spanish do, stuff it inside a mattress,” the Londoner added.

Could Cyprus be the ideal testing ground for similar immoral practises by other banks in the future? Such thoughts are most certainly ripe in the minds of many Europeans who have seen the banking sector drop from incompetent to what only can be described as dishonourable.

Ozmen Safa, a property developer in both Cyprus and London, told BBC Teesside Radio that the imposed tax on bank deposits in Cyprus was a breach of human rights and that the implications of the scandal will see consumer confidence in banking systems plummet in Europe. Not only is Ozmen worried about how the scandal will affect his business and other people’s businesses on the island, but also believes that the crisis in Cyprus could potentially have much higher implications for the whole of the Euro zone.

“It is affecting people’s confidence,” says Mr Safa. “The word is contagion, where does it stop? How many other broken banks are there out there? For a small island that contributes less than 1 percent output to Europe it could end up being a house of cards for the whole of Europe,” continued the property developer in Cyprus.

As the black clouds of monetary meltdown gather over Europe and the great evil of unemployment continues to rise, those in positions of power seem to be making bad call after bad call, throwing money at impossible problems only to see yet more money wasted and the problems still standing there. The Cypriot “bank robbery” as it has been referred to, is a new tactic and direct affront on savers to whom the banks rely upon for survival and indeed existence. Vladimir Putin was correct to call these moves dangerous.

Gabrielle Pickard is a freelance writer based in Cheshire, United Kingdom.

Posted on: April 10, 2013, 10:07 am Category: The View From Here Tagged with: , , , ,